WIKI Final POST

As I sit and reflect on the technological advances I have seen throughout my twenty-five years of life, I can hardly imagine where technology will have advanced by the year 2020. During my life, I have seen computers virtually extinct typewriters. Today, communication is no longer limited to “snail mall” or land line telephones. Cell phones can be seen in the hands of almost any person, regardless of their age, socioeconomic status, or nationality. E-mail and text-messaging is keeping the world connected, as well.

“Students who begin kindergarten this fall will graduate from high school thirteen years from now, in the spring of 2020. At that point they'll become voters, and so will need 20/20 vision about the nature of the complex 2020 natural and electronic worlds they'll inhabit, and about the challenges our society will then confront. Helping 2007 kindergarteners attain 2020 20/20 vision during 13 years of school is compounded by the reality that it's almost impossible to predict now what their adult world will be like.” (Dr. Sylwester)

As an educator, it is imperative as I confront the advances of year 2020 I am optimistic, scientific, and democratic in order to prepare my students for the challenges they will face.

I agree with Dr. Sylwester No Child Left Behind, which currently defines public K-12 education, has been negatively stated, rather it could be said Every Child Learns. Educators and parents need to look forward to the future with a new positive outlook. This will help diminish the pessimism many currently feel about education.

Secondly, as an educator it is imperative I understand the massive advances that has been made in science and technology in recent years. I must transmit this knowledge to my students to prevent raising another generation of voters who are uninformed on socially important issues related to genetics, neuroscience, global climate changes, and computer technology. If educators don’t rise to this challenge, then what will be the opinion of our future voters?

Finally, school is the only institution in our society in which young children interact for 13 years with many hundreds of non-kin at a similar developmental stage.

“A result of the current standards and assessment focus is the test—driven drive for efficient individual performance. It's achieved at the expense of social interaction and group decision-making that are central to the development of democratic skills. We've discovered during the past several years how important it is for our culture to understand and negotiate with other cultures.” (Dr. Sylwester)

Again, as an educator it is imperative I explicitly teach my students the social and democratic skills to become productive citizens in our society.

In conclusion, it is imperative as I confront the advances of year 2020 I am optimistic, scientific, and democratic in order to prepare my students for their challenges they will face. If parents and educators do not demand a 21st century education for 21st century students, then who will?

Learning Theories: A Cognitivist's Approach

Principles of the Cognitivist Learning Theory

As with behaviorism, cognitive psychology can be traced back to the ancient Greeks, Plato, and Aristotle. However, it wasn’t until the late 1950s that the cognitive revolution became evident in American psychology. Jean Piaget developed the major aspects of this theory and is one of the most noted for his work with cognitivism.

Under this learning theory, theorists perceive a learners mind as an information processor with short-term and long-term memories, including working memory, and the assumption of learning is information transmission and processing. This can be more easily translated as the learner receives information, stores information into short-term memory, and transfer of information from short-term to long-term memory through practice provided by the teacher. Cognitivists’ theories differ from the behaviorists’ view that stimulus-response alone could form the basis for higher order learning. Instead, cognitivists are more concerned with the internal processes that take place during learning. Cognitivists believe students can learn passively sitting still and absorbing knowledge rather than by actively manipulating and testing the results of their inquiries. Finally, it is concluded if the student has the same statement or reasoning in his/her head as the teacher or as it appears in the text, then learning has occurred.

Roles of the Cognitivist Learning Theory

Student Learning

· Passively engaged

· Information receiver

· Memorizer of knowledge or rules taught by teacher

· Respond to questions given by the teacher

Teacher Responsibility

· Information deliverer

· Learning environment controller

· Has to ensure on prior knowledge or skills students have and decide on appropriate skills and learning objectives

Pros and Cons

The cognitivist approach views the teacher as a facilitator (deliverer) of information and the student as the receiver of information. In this approach, students rarely have an opportunity for active engagement in learning. Most often, students sit passively as information is delivered. This does not allow for students to work with manipulatives or explore learning in differentiated styles. Learning is viewed only when students can apply knowledge back to teacher in the same way it was given to them.

Computer Uses of the Cognitivist Learning Theory

· Tutorial software (work one-to-one with student much like student-teacher)

· Simulation software

· Problem-solving software

· Multimedia encyclopedias & electronic books

Chapter Six and Seven Response!

To be completely honest, I was just really confused after reading Chapter Six. I had a difficult time understanding and following the ideas given about multimedia and hypermedia. Rather than spending more time laboring over this Chapter, I decided to move on to Chapter Seven.

As I read Chapter Seven I was posed with some conflicting ideas. First, I was intriqued when Durden (2001) said that "no existing form of distance learning can similarly affirm students as individuals and also force them to acknowledge the idea of others...Disenfranchised students, as much as their affluent and advantaged peers, deserve a chance at a residential, liberal education, not an unproven alternative." I really couldn't agree more with this statement; I believe every student should have the opportunity to go to school, meet with a teacher/professor, establish a bond, and have hands-on learning experiences. However the option of Distance Learning is great for those students who are challenged and may need to use this capability. Secondly, I must tell you MY real opinion of Distance Learning. This is my first class to take in this format and I am really not so sure I will take another one again. I am also taking another class similar to this one on Thursday nights but it is not quite as bad because it deals less with technology. I am a visual learner. I also ask a lot of questions. I also procrastinate. This environment is not best for me! Less just be honest, I am struggling! I need to meet with an instructor and build a relationship. Finally, though, I do support Distance Learning because it has brought many working men and women to school to get an education for the first time or to finish an education Distance learning has changed the way teachers teach and has changed the way students think about learning. Ultimately, I think if the student is motivated and ready for the task, distance learning can be an powerful learning tool!

Chapter Five Response!

While reading this chapter on software tools, I had mixed emotions about my beliefs on this subject. In our book textbook it states, "Some educators object to the use of tools such as test generators and worksheet generators, saying that they encourage teachers to use technology to maintain current methods, rather than using technology in more innovative ways." First, I must admit, in my three years of teaching I have not used test or worksheet generators regularly in my practice. However, I do believe just like with any new tool these could be abused if misused, but I do see the positives that could be gained from these tools, as well. First, test and worksheet generators would make life "simpler" for teachers. Teachers must be aware while using this kind of tool he/she must be mindful of student's individual needs. Teachers must also make sure the test questions assess the material that was taught. Secondly, this test makes life "simpler" for teachers because you can easily adapt each test to the needs of each student. Teachers can alter the test by eliminating or creating different questions that best fit the needs of that student. Finally, these generators make life "simpler" for teachers because it reduces the time it takes to make tests. Just as I said before, if these tools are used appropriately in the classroom, then they can be a valuable tool.

Class Comments!

I really did not understand the value of comments until Dr. Wang addressed the importance on Blackboard. I did my undergraduate work at the University of Alabama and unfortunately I had little experience with a course such as this one. I also was unable to attend the first class meeting so I believe I had a misconception about COMMENTS; however, it is all CLEAR to me now! I think I understand the purpose and I definitely see how it is helping me and my group! Here are some of my comments. I hope to see them improve as the course progresses!

Lesson Critique:

I am really impressed with this critique. First, allow me to point out the only negative. I am a q & a, chart, bulleted points kind-of-person. I think your response would be easier to read if you put it in this format. HOWEVER, it is just a SUGGESTION. I agree totally with your thought.. while some students are researching via the web, have some of the students research using library resources such as an atlas or a book. I have found students today lack these significant skills. This approach would provide different ways to present ideas. Students will be able to see the same information can come from different sources!

Tina,
This lesson is really neat! Our REACH teacher(gifted program) at our school uses aerial maps in her accelerated classroom. She teaches with Google Earth a lot. These gifted students love it. I know she lets the students search for their homes, places of interest, etc. These students are third-fifth grade. I noticed you said you would use it in your third grade classroom? However, at the top of the plan, it said it could be adapted for K-5. I am a little uncertain how this lesson, using Microsoft word, aerial maps, and e-mail could be adapted for K-1.

Hey Tina! I looked over your Final copy! Awesome! One thought? Were you supposed to have 3 references? I am about to post mine and I only have two as well? So, I just saw in previous posts where it said 3. Let me know what you think!
Thanks,
Ashley

Hey guys! I took each of your suggestions into consideration. I hope this looks good. I had one question? I have only two references? Were we supposed to have 3?

Yes, I used the same format as you and I mentioned to Michelle she might want to use something like ours. It is much easier to organize and read. However it was just a suggestion for her. I disagree with the fact that this teacher was trying to cover too many technology standards. I think it was necessary and happened to be applicable and appropriate for the students to show what they learned by putting the information in a powerpoint; however, I think I might could add in my critique there could have been an alternative way to present their findings, maybe a poster or such! Thank you for the suggestion. I also must note that I did mention in my critique the teacher should have more involvement as a role of a facilitator in a discussion. Thank you for your suggestions! I will make some of these changes in my critique.

Hey guys! I am sorry. I got my days confused, but here is my lesson plan critique! I got this lesson from ALEX. It is a Social Studies lesson. It integrates the internet and powerpoint!

Definition of Learning:

Hey girls! I most certainly agree that learning occurs when one acquires new knowledge? However, you mentioned exploration, here. Students must use this new knowledge to explore new concepts, right? Is that the same as application? Applying this new knowledge to another concept. For instance, in my classroom my students have trouble applying language mechanics in their own writing but have no trouble recognizing it in isolation in the Language textbook. Here, I don't acknowledge this as NEW LEARNING? Would you?

Michelle,
I really agree with you on the fact that we never quit learning! Learning is life-long! I also like what you said "it is up to us to nurture and guide the child to his/her fullest potential." This couldn't be more true! As a teacher it is our job, to lead our students to make wise learning decisions. Finally, I in your key points about learning..... I especially liked your point about mistakes! When I think about my knowledge and where I have learned the most, it is from my mistakes. Children must understand it is okay to make mistakes, but to learn from them!

Since this assignment was posted, I have labored over a strict definition to give learning. However, what I have found is there is not one specific definition for this powerful word.
First, learning is a process. I completely agree it is the process in which one acquires new knowledge through a variety of tasks. Secondly, learning occurs after communication and application of new knowledge. Learning is not merely learning a new task. Students must be required to take the new knowledge and communicate and apply it in a given situation. For instance, in my classroom students struggle applying language mechanics rules in their own writing but can apply them in isolation in the language textbook. Strange, but it’s true. Finally, I believe teachers must be able to facilitate learning in the classroom. Teachers must make it clear to students that learning is an on-going and life-long process. Teachers must also make it understood that teachers are learners too!

Learning Theories:

Hey Ladies! Thanks for meeting yesterday at Panera Bread to discuss our final group projects. We are a great team! Remember to have you draft posted by tonight at some point. Also, begin commenting. I will post the first draft Wednesday night! Good luck!

Ashley (Group Leader, Cognitivist)
Michelle (Behaviorism)
Valerie (Social Constructivism)
Tina (Constructivist)

Michelle, thanks for organizing our meeting.... I must point out that I do not agree with behaviorism in the grand scheme of things however I do see its positives with drill and practice when it comes to learning facts such as multiplication. For me, that is one way students will learn their facts. I get very frustrated when they come to me in fourth grade and do not know their facts and we are not able to move on to division.

Valerie,
I like the way you broke down your theory. The Social Constructivist theory allows the teacher to teach more in line with Best Practices. The students are more active and learning becomes more authentic. I think this model also best represents how we work in society and prepares students for real world situations.

Fabulous job, Tina! This will be easy for me to work with for our final draft. I modeled mine closely to yours to make it easier! Your the best!
Ashley

Absolutely Valerie, I really see my kids get bored when I stand and lecture; however, I can remember in high school the students who "just got it". And I will admit I was jealous of those students, because it took more for me. I had to be actively engaged or I was "just lost". That may have been in part due to my short attention span. All the while, we as teachers must meet the needs of all learners!

Chapter Four Response!

In my EXPERT opinion, chapter four was much easier to read than the previous chapters. However, this chapter had some points to consider concerning word processing and keyboarding skills. The author states educators believe word processors can be a valuable tool in the classroom but can also be controversial, as well. The argument at hand is in some classroom some students who use a word processor to type a report have been given a lesser score than those of his/her peers who chose to hand write his/her report. If language mechanics was an issue, then word processor should not have been an option. More importantly, I do not understand why these students were graded more strictly. In my fourth grade classroom, I encourage my students to use Microsoft Word to type anything we write. We have five classroom computers while many of them also have personal computers at home to type on as well. I use these opportunities to teach mini-lessons in language. This is not a time to teach strict lessons in keyboarding skills; however, I have taught proper positioning of the hands and body. My focus is on teaching the students to recognize misspelled words and improper use of grammar, rather than correct typing skills. I know that these skills will improve with more practice in computer class, at home, and using text messaging.

Chapter Three Response!

I can relate to instructional software the most in chapter three. In my fourth grade classroom instructional software is used daily. I have five literacy stations students rotate to during a two hour reading block. By far my students enjoy going to the computer station the most. There are four computers at the station with each computer having its own personal desk. While students are at that rotation I do not have to worry about time on task. Students are very engaged in the various instructional software programs I may have them working on. The programs I use the most are Lightspan and Cornerstone. Students rarely need tutorial work because of the vast amount of knowledge of technology they have today. Actually, much of my concern today in my classroom with technology is keeping my students entertained. Today, many of my students have their own laptops or personal computers at home equipped with the newest technology. As a teacher it is my job to stay trained with the newest technology, know how to use it appropriately, incorporate it into my classroom, and share this new knowledge with my students.

Chapter Two Response!

As a teacher, we have to make critical decisions every second of the day. I most certainly agree “different learning calls for different teaching methods.” I support the constructivist, inquiry based approach to learning and teaching. In this chapter, however, the direct method for technology is presented. I must agree learning should be structured where the teacher teaches a planned lesson but I do not agree the student should have to memorize in order to master. In relation to my experience in school, I have learned more from engagement than not what someone has told me. Generally, in my classroom, I teach and assess using a variety of methods to meet the needs of each individual and unique learner. While meeting the standards for the fourth grade, I also like to connect the content of the curriculum to the students’ lives so that they can see how learning is applicable in their lives their lives today!

After reading this chapter I somewhat agree with the unification of the two theories. It is encouraging both models support technology, whereas in the past debates there has been less support for each other. The goal of both models is the Technology Integration Planning Model. I hope to plan for effective use for technology in my classroom! The chart on page 67 may be of some assistance for me as well as other teachers.

Chapter One Response!

Technology is more present today than ever before in our society and it continues to develop each day. Advances in software are rising daily, whether it is with computers, cell phones, or etc. This is exciting because these advances are changing educational practices for the positive. Chapter One of Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, goes in to great depth discussing wireless connectivity. As I sit and think about wireless capabilities, I think about all the places in my community that has wireless internet for laptop users. This technological advance has made accessing the network as simple as the click of a button without connections with cables. It is necessary for me to add this has made my life easier with school work and class work as I travel. I am able to hook up in airports, restaurants, and hotels while I am away from home. This advancement does not stop in our community it is also present in our schools, as well. Many schools today have “hotspots” around the building where teachers and students can access the internet from anywhere in the school. Wireless connectivity has made classroom organization much simpler because teachers do not have to have particular stations for computer set up, rather students can access the internet while sitting at various locations. As much as I despise arranging my classroom, this is truly beneficial to me. Luckily, this wireless trend has provided more opportunities of classroom design without being stuck with placing classroom computers in one location. I am excited to see where these advancements will take us in the future!

Hey Ashley

Thanks for inviting me to post on your blog. Lori

My First BLOG!

This was my first time to create a blog. Wow! It was somewhat confusing; however I think I have it figured out. I am hopeful it will get easier with more use and experience!